Passion fruit juice with different sweeteners: sensory profile by descriptive analysis and acceptance
Izabela Furtado de Oliveira Rocha, Helena María André Bolini
Food Science & Nutrition
Abstract
This study evaluated the effect of different sweeteners on the sensory profile, acceptance, and drivers of preference of passion fruit juice samples sweetened with sucrose, aspartame, sucralose, stevia, cyclamate/saccharin blend 2:1, and neotame. Sensory profiling was performed by 12 trained assessors using quantitative descriptive analysis (QDA). Acceptance tests (appearance, aroma, flavor, texture and overall impression) were performed with 124 consumers of tropical fruit juice. Samples with sucrose, aspartame and sucralose showed similar sensory profile (P < 0.05), without bitter taste, bitter aftertaste, and metallic taste, and samples with sucrose and sucralose did not differ from each other for the attribute sweet aftertaste. Passion fruit flavor affected positively and sweet aftertaste affected negatively the acceptance of the samples. Samples sweetened with aspartame, sucralose, and sucrose presented higher acceptance scores for the attributes flavor, texture, and overall impression, with no significant (P < 0.05) differences between them. Aspartame and sucralose can be good substitutes for sucrose in passion fruit juice.
Extracted Claims
6 claims extracted from this paper into the knowledge graph
samples with sucrose and sucralose did not differ for the attribute sweet aftertaste
“Samples with sucrose and sucralose did not differ from each other for the attribute sweet aftertaste.”
samples with sucrose, aspartame, and sucralose showed similar sensory profile
“Samples with sucrose, aspartame and sucralose showed similar sensory profile (P < 0.05), without bitter taste, bitter aftertaste, and metallic taste.”
sensory profiling performed by 12 trained assessors
“Sensory profiling was performed by 12 trained assessors using quantitative descriptive analysis (QDA).”